|
Nearby Communities in the 1890s
We largely built the following list with information that came from an Atlas published by Rand McNally in 1895. The Atlas had details such as the population of the community (which appears to have come from the 1890 Census) and whether there was a post office and/or railroad service available. Over time, we will continue to add communities that we find during our research.
If it applies, we indicate whether a community no longer exists and is now historic.<1>
The Rand McNally Atlas shows that in 1895, Wet Glaize had a post office and no railroad service.
The following communities are listed based on their distance from Wet Glaize, with the one closest to Wet Glaize listed first.
- Glaize ‑ Historic
(4 miles [6.4 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Glaize have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Glaize
- Glaize is located in Camden County
- Montreal
(4 miles [6.4 km] to the northwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Montreal have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Montreal
- Montreal is located in Camden County
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Montreal <3>
- Toronto
(5 miles [8 km] to the north)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Toronto have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Toronto
- Toronto is located in Camden County
- Stoutland
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the south)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Stoutland have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Stoutland
- Stoutland is located in Camden County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 201 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Stoutland <3>
- Richland
(8 miles [12.9 km] to the southeast)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Richland have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Richland
- Richland is located in Pulaski County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 1,800 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Richland <3>
- Hawkeye
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the northeast)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Hawkeye. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Hawkeye
- Hawkeye is located in Pulaski County
- Decaturville
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the west)
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Decaturville
- Decaturville is located in Camden County
- Sleeper
(11 miles [17.7 km] to the south)
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Sleeper
- Sleeper is located in Laclede County
- Swedeborg
(11 miles [17.7 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Swedeborg have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Swedeborg
- Swedeborg is located in Pulaski County
- Brumley
(11 miles [17.7 km] to the north)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Brumley have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Brumley
- Brumley is located in Miller County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 96 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Brumley <3>
- Linn Creek
(12 miles [19.3 km] to the northwest)
- Eldridge
(13 miles [20.9 km] to the southwest)
- Crocker
(14 miles [22.5 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Crocker have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Crocker
- Crocker is located in Pulaski County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 1,031 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Crocker <3>
- Abo
(15 miles [24.1 km] to the south)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Abo. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Abo
- Abo is located in Laclede County
- Damsel
(15 miles [24.1 km] to the northwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Damsel have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Damsel
- Damsel is located in Camden County
- Iberia
(17 miles [27.4 km] to the northeast)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Iberia have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Iberia
- Iberia is located in Miller County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 753 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Iberia <3>
- Roach
(17 miles [27.4 km] to the west)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Roach. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Roach
- Roach is located in Camden County
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Roach <3>
- Lebanon
(18 miles [29 km] to the southwest)
- Waynesville
(18 miles [29 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Waynesville have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Waynesville
- Waynesville is located in Pulaski County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 5,308 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Waynesville <3>
- Oakland
(19 miles [30.6 km] to the south)
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Oakland
- Oakland is located in Laclede County
- Drynob
(19 miles [30.6 km] to the south)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Drynob have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Drynob
- Drynob is located in Laclede County
- Hancock
(19 miles [30.6 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Hancock have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Hancock
- Hancock is located in Pulaski County
- Celt
(20 miles [32.2 km] to the west)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Celt. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Celt
- Celt is located in Dallas County
- Bagnell
(21 miles [33.8 km] to the north)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Bagnell. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Bagnell
- Bagnell is located in Miller County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 96 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Bagnell <3>
- Tuscumbia
(22 miles [35.4 km] to the north)
- Purvis
(22 miles [35.4 km] to the northwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Purvis have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Purvis
- Purvis is located in Camden County
Off-the-Road Links ...
The official website for State of Missouri: https://www.mo.gov/
Footnotes ...
<1> | We use the term 'Historic' broadly and it generally means that the community no longer exists. However, it can also mean that the community might still exist, but was significantly larger or had a more 'official' existence in the past than it does now. Unfortunately our sources of data have proven to be unreliable. If you can provide us with more specific information about Wet Glaize, please let us know so that we can improve our accuracy. |
<2> | The location has been supplied by the Geographic Names Information System - which is maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). While these values should be definitive, we found that accuracy can vary and you should double-check the location if accuracy is required. |
<3> | While we're fans and frequent users of TripAdvisor, you should know that we're also members of the TripAdvisor affiliate program. |
<4> | An 'estimated' location is one where we have been given GPS coordinates, but are unable to verify the accuracy of those coordinates. That said, we have some confidence that we have placed the marker near the actual location. A typical reason for being unable to verify a location is that it might be on private property or maybe historic and gone without an obvious trace. |
|
|