|
Nearby Communities in the 1890s
We largely built the following list with information that came from an Atlas published by Rand McNally in 1895. The Atlas had details such as the population of the community (which appears to have come from the 1890 Census) and whether there was a post office and/or railroad service available. Over time, we will continue to add communities that we find during our research.
If it applies, we indicate whether a community no longer exists and is now historic.<1>
The Rand McNally Atlas shows that South Cabot had a population of 72 people in 1895 with a post office and no railroad service.
The following communities are listed based on their distance from South Cabot, with the one closest to South Cabot listed first.
- East Cabot
(Less than 2 miles to the northeast)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for East Cabot have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for East Cabot
- East Cabot is located in Washington County
- Marshfield
(3 miles [4.8 km] to the west)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Marshfield have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Marshfield
- Marshfield is located in Washington County
- Population from the 2020 Census: 251 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Marshfield <3>
- Cabot
(3 miles [4.8 km] to the northwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Cabot have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Cabot
- Cabot is located in Washington County
- Estimated population in 2012: 238 people
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Cabot <3>
- Lower Cabot
(3 miles [4.8 km] to the northwest)
- Lanesboro
(4 miles [6.4 km] to the southwest)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Lanesboro. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Lanesboro
- Lanesboro is located in Washington County
- Google driving directions:
- From your current location to Lanesboro
- From South Cabot to Lanesboro
- West Danville
(4 miles [6.4 km] to the northeast)
- Peacham
(5 miles [8 km] to the southeast)
- South Peacham
(6 miles [9.7 km] to the southeast)
- East Peacham
(6 miles [9.7 km] to the east)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for East Peacham have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for East Peacham
- East Peacham is located in Caledonia County
- Harvey Hollow
(6 miles [9.7 km] to the east)
- Walden
(6 miles [9.7 km] to the northeast)
- Note: We haven't been able to verify our GPS coordinates for Walden. Although the coordinates have been estimated, they should be in the vicinity.<4>
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Walden
- Walden is located in Caledonia County
- Google driving directions:
- From your current location to Walden
- From South Cabot to Walden
- West Barnet
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the southeast)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for West Barnet have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for West Barnet
- West Barnet is located in Caledonia County
- Greenbank Hollow
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the east)
- Danville
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the northeast)
- South Walden
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the north)
- South Woodbury
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the northwest)
- East Calais
(7 miles [11.3 km] to the west)
- Woodbury
(8 miles [12.9 km] to the northwest)
- North Calais
(8 miles [12.9 km] to the west)
- North Montpelier
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the southwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for North Montpelier have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for North Montpelier
- North Montpelier is located in Washington County
- Plainfield
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the southwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Plainfield have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Plainfield
- Plainfield is located in Washington County
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Plainfield <3>
- North Walden
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the north)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for North Walden have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for North Walden
- North Walden is located in Caledonia County
- Calais
(9 miles [14.5 km] to the west)
- Hardwick
(10 miles [16.1 km] to the northwest)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for Hardwick have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for Hardwick
- Hardwick is located in Caledonia County
- Jump to TripAdvisor's Tourism page for Hardwick <3>
- Pumpkin Hill ‑ Historic
(10 miles [16.1 km] to the east)
- North Danville
(10 miles [16.1 km] to the northeast)
- Note: The GPS coordinates that we are using for North Danville have been provided by the GNIS.<2> The coordinates still need to be verified.
- Jump to our Gazetteer entry for North Danville
- North Danville is located in Caledonia County
- East Hardwick
(10 miles [16.1 km] to the north)
Off-the-Road Links ...
The official website for State of Vermont: https://www.vermont.gov/
Footnotes ...
<1> | We use the term 'Historic' broadly and it generally means that the community no longer exists. However, it can also mean that the community might still exist, but was significantly larger or had a more 'official' existence in the past than it does now. Unfortunately our sources of data have proven to be unreliable. If you can provide us with more specific information about South Cabot, please let us know so that we can improve our accuracy. |
<2> | The location has been supplied by the Geographic Names Information System - which is maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). While these values should be definitive, we found that accuracy can vary and you should double-check the location if accuracy is required. |
<3> | While we're fans and frequent users of TripAdvisor, you should know that we're also members of the TripAdvisor affiliate program. |
<4> | An 'estimated' location is one where we have been given GPS coordinates, but are unable to verify the accuracy of those coordinates. That said, we have some confidence that we have placed the marker near the actual location. A typical reason for being unable to verify a location is that it might be on private property or maybe historic and gone without an obvious trace. |
|
|